SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

AVTAR PENNATHUR, PRITHVI RAJ, B.L.ANAND
P. K. NANDA – Appellant
Versus
GEM INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : In person.
For the Respondent No. 1: Sh. M.L. Puruthi, Attorney.
Respondent No. 2: In person.

ORDER

B.L. Anand, Member—This is an appeal filed by Shri P.K. Nanda, R/o B-115 G.T. Kamal Road, Delhi against the impugned order dated 13.9.89 passed by the learned District Forum, Delhi. The appellant has agitated that he had purchased a Gem refrigerator from M/s. Gem India of 2/90 Connaught Circus, New Delhi through their agent M/s. Sindhu Traders, 8-E Kamla Nagar, Delhi on 31.5.84. That he had also purchased a Gem Voltage Stabilizer alongwith the Gem refrigerator which was sold to him as a tag item with the assurance of free service for both the items during the guarantee period of 5 years up to 31.5.89. He has further alleged that the so called service was not at all free service as they had charged Rs. 450/- in the bill as anticipated service. The appellant has further stated that while passing the impugned order dated 13.9.89, the learned District Forum has allowed him a refund of Rs. 40/- out of the total claim of Rs. 120/- which had been wrongly charged by the respondents and which charges were unjustified and illegal. He also stated that because of the refusal of the dealer M/s. Sindhu Traders, respondent No. 2 for making repairs of the voltage stabilizer, the appellant had











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top