ELLEN DHARKAR, G.G.LONEY, M.G.GAVAI
S. M. SETHNA – Appellant
Versus
ANIL CHOKSHI – Respondent
Mr. Justice G.G. Loney, President— In this complaint, the complainant alleged that a Konica Automatic Processor Model QX-40 for processing X-ray and sonography films was purchased by the complainant from the opposite party was defective.
2. The complainant alleged that on 4.10.1990 the O.P. 1 sent a proforma invoice for Rs. 44,000/- dated 1.10.90 from Konica Corporation, Tokyo Japan vide Exhibit B-I and B-II. On 31.12.90, the opposite party informed the complainant that the machine has been shipped for delivery. On 15.1.91; the Opposite Party (O.P.) No. 1 again informed the complainant to extend the date for delivery as goods were not in stock for Indian Market and they would produce the machine in March, 1991. The relevant X-Ray is DID-II. The complainant had also paid Rs. 4,000/- as service charges for the import of the said machine on 24.4.91 vide Ex. E. The complainant cleared the custom duties on 21.5.91 by paying Rs. 82,590/- vide Ex. ’F’. When Carton was opened, the complainant found that the machine was inspected on November, 1987 indicating that it was an old machine. After installation on 29.5.91 by O.P. 1, the machine was found defective and not in proper working ord
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.