SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.G.LONEY, ATANASIO MONTEIRO, SUBHALAKSHIMI NAIK
MAHESH S. RAIKAR – Appellant
Versus
WHEEL MAGNETS – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : In person.
For the Respondent:Mr. S.D. Lotlikar, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice G.G. Loney, President— This is an appeal against the order of the District Forum, Panaji dated 28.2.1992 passed in complaint No. 58 of 91. The complaint was lodged by the complainant Mahesh Raikar alleging that Rs. 1,500/- were accepted from him by M/s. Wheel Magnets towards the booking of the Motorcycle. The complainant alleged that the opposite party demanded from him the entire amount of the motorcycle before the delivery which he refused as a result of which the complainant was not provided with the Motorcycle as per the order. The complaint was dismissed by the District Forum on an earlier occasion but an order was set aside by this Commission since the parties were not properly informed. After a fresh inquiry by the District Forum, the complaint again has been dismissed on the ground that the complainant is not entitled to compensation as no exact date of the delivery was mentioned by the complainant.

2. We have heard Shri Mahesh Raikar and Shri S.D. Lotlikar, Adv. for the respondent. The complaint has been dismissed on the ground that there was no fixed date for delivery. In our view dismissal of the complaint in irrelevant situation is not justified. We gath





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top