SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

AVTAR PENNATHUR, R.N.MITTAL, B.L.ANAND
SURESH BHARGAVA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : In Person.
For the Respondent:Mrs. Neena Aggarwal, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. B.L. Anand, Member — This appeal has been filed by Shri Suresh Bhargava against the impugned order passed by the learned District Forum on 17.3.92. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant Shri Suresh Bhargava registered a letter with the respondent for delivery in Singapore. He had enclosed in the envelop a draft for $ 1765.12 equivalent to Indian rupees 26,000/-. It was found by the postal authorities for Singapore that the addressee had shifted the residence and as such the letter could not be delivered at the address indicated by the appellant Shri Suresh Bhargava at the time of registration.

2. It was held by the learned District Forum in the impugned order that the addressee has shifted elsewhere and it was not the job of the respondents or even that of the Singapore Postal Authorities to indulge in a wild goose chase. They also observed that the letter had since been delivered at the changed address there was, thus, no deficiency and as such the Forum had dismissed the complaint. The appellant has challenged the impugned order passed by the District Forum.

3. We have gone through the record and heard both the parties. The contention of the appellant was that










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top