SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.K.M.LODHA, SARIA KHAN
RADHEY SHYAM THAKURIA – Appellant
Versus
RAJASTHAN ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice S.K.M. Lodha, President— By this appeal under Sec. 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (the “Act” herein) the unsuccessful complainant questions the correctness and legality of the order passed by the District Forum, Jaipur in Complaint Case No. 477/89 by which the complaint was dismissed. The complainant had obtained an electric connection for running oil expeller. His consumer No. is 68. According to him he is regularly paying the charges according to the bills supplied to him from time to time. On 11.8.1989 the complainant received the bill for Rs. 9,246.14. According to him the bill was erroneous for his regular consumption as shown in the bill was 440 units. He made, enquiries. He was told that the electric charges were also included as the meter of the appellant was running slow. On 14.8.89 the opposite parties-respondents removed the meter from the premises. It was prayed that the bill relating to August, 1989 in which Rs. 9,246.14 have been additionally mentioned may be cancelled and a direction may be issued to the opposite parties not to realise this amount from him. It was prayed that Rs. 1,000/- may be awarded as compensation to the complainant from












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top