SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DAMODAR THANVI, SARIA KHAN, S.K.M.LODHA
DIRECTOR, RAJASTHAN STATE INSURANCE & G. P. F. – Appellant
Versus
GEETA DEVI – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. M.L. Vyas, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice S.K.M. Lodha, President—This appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“the Act” herein) has been filed by the opposite party-appellant against the order dated 26-7-1991 passed by the District Forum, Jhunjhunu in Complaint Case No. 48/91. By the impugned order the complainant-respondent was granted some reliefs. The appeal was presented on 23-9-1991. Office has reported that it is barred by 29 days. Office report is not contested. An application for certified copy of the order appealed against was submitted with the memo of appeal. It was countersigned by the OIC on 29-7-1991. A notice was issued to the appellant to show cause as to why the appeal be not rejected as barred by time. Mr. M.L. Vyas, learned Counsel has appeared on behalf of the appellant. He invited our attention to the application for condonation of delay submitted by the appellant alongwith the memo of appeal. Affidavit of Shri Surendra Pal Singh, Deputy Director, Rajasthan State Insurance and G.P.F., Jaipur was submitted in support of the appeal. The question arises whether the appellant has succeeded in making out a sufficient cause for presenting the appeal, after the expiry o




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top