SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.N.MITTAL, B.L.ANAND, AVTAR PENNATHUR
ASHA LUGANI – Appellant
Versus
PREMIER AUTOMOBILES LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Complainant :Mr. Rajesh Mitra, Advocate.
For the O.P. :Mr. Shishir Sharma, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice R.N. Mittal, President— Briefly the facts of the case are that the petitioner is the sole-proprietor of M/s Asha Fashions 1893, Uday Chand Marg, Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi-24. The firm has been exporting fashion garments for the last several years to the various countries. She, with the funds of the firm, purchased a Premier Padmini BU/AC car from respondent No. 2 Prem Nath Motors for a sum of Rs. 1,53,816/- . She took delivery of the car on 18.5.90. The car is being manufactured by respondent No. 1. Before taking delivery of the car, it is alleged, she found several defects and deficiencies in the car. She was informed by respondent No. 2 that the defects were of minor nature and would be repaired at the time of first service. On the assurance given by the respondent No. 2, she took delivery of the car.

2. It is next pleaded that since the time the car has been delivered to the complainant, it has been giving trouble to her. There are various defects in the car, which could not be rectified by the respondents at the three services. Ultimately she left the car at the workshop of respondent No. 2 at Mandir Marg. She, it is alleged, was informed that the engine of th















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top