S.A.SHAH, R.K.SHAH
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
MEHTA ROAD LINES – Respondent
Mr. Justice S.A. Shah, President — The complainant has realised that after the decision of the Hon'ble National Commission, the complaint by subrogatee (Insurance Company) will not be entertained since the Insurance Company is not the consumer.
2. We have, in another matter, decided that if a complaint is file by the Insurance Company alongwith the consumer, such complaint can be entertained. Mr. Panchal, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant therefore seeks permission to withdraw the complaint to enable his client to file a fresh complaint or file a civil suit with proper parties since there is a technical defect of proper parties.
3. Mr. Rakesh Mazumdar appearing for the opposite party was shown the application but he has no submission to make. This question has been arisen after the decision of the Hon'ble National Commission in the case of M/s. Green Transport Company v. New India Assurance Company Ltd. reported in II (1992) CPJ Page 349 (NC). According to our opinion, there is no reason to deny the withdrawal since Mr. Panchal wants it to avoid technical difficulties in future. The purshish is taken on record.
ORDER
Permission as sought by Mr. Pancha1 is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.