SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.G.DESAI, K.R.RAMASWAMY IYENGAR, SUDHA V.REDDY
MULLA COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
M. M. BHALDAR – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice R.G. Desai, President — After hearing the Appellant's Counsel and perusing the records, the Commission (per Desai, J.) delivered the following:

2. This appeal is directed against the Order dated 9.2.1990 passed by the District Forum, Belgaum in Complaint No. 3/1989 on its file. It arises in this way:

3. The Respondent herein had purchased Orson 20''colour TV for a sum of Rs. ll,850/- on 9.12.1988 from the Appellant. Some time after the purchase the colour TV started malfunctioning and it was exhibiting black and white picture, quality of which was poor. The Respondent brought the said facts to the notice of the Appellant who went to the house of the Respondent but could not rectify the defect. As the repeated requests of the Respondent did not yield any result, the complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum, Belgaum. The appellant registered the complaint by contending inter alia that he had sent his technician to the house of the Respondent but the Respondent did not allow his technician to inspect the TV and to repair it; that the technician asked the Respondent to take the TV to the show-room of the Appellant for attending to the defects but he did n





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top