G.G.LONEY, ATANASIO MONTEIRO, SUBHALAKSHIMI NAIK
ACCUMULATOR MANUFACTURING CO. – Appellant
Versus
P. K. KHINDRI – Respondent
Mr. Justice G.G. Loney, President—This complaint is made by a Partnership Firm against the Telephone Department. It is alleged that the complainant's office-cum-residence was shifted from flat No. F-2 in the first week of September, 1991. It is the case of the complainant that due to the change of accommodation, he wanted his phone connection bearing No. 46994 to be shifted to his new premises. In addition to the aforesaid telephone connection, the complainant also have another telephone bearing No. 43363 at his new office located at Caranzalem Goa. It is the case of the complainant that since 23.3.1992, his Phone No. 43363 is not working for which he made several complaints. The complainant alleged that despite repeated attempts, OP was negligent in repairing Phone No. 43363. It is the grievance of the complainant that although his Telephone No. 43363 was not working, yet he was charged full rental charges of his Telephone No. 45994 amounting to Rs. 23/-.
2. According to the complainant, OPs were deficient in their services to shift telephone to his new premises and for delay in respect of another telephone. The complainant, therefore, claimed direction for shifting of' Phone
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.