SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

AVTAR PENNATHUR, R.N.MITTAL, B.L.ANAND
APPOLLO TUBES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
LAL CHAND MALHOTRA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Anil Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Nemo.

ORDER

Mr. Justice R.N. Mittal, President — This appeal has been filed by the defendant against the orders of the District Forum dated 9.2.90 by which the defendant has been ordered to pay Rs. 300/- on account of dividend to the complainant with 16% interest from October, 1986 till the date of payment, within one month from the date of order.

2. Briefly, the facts are that the complainant respondent is a share holder of M/s. Apollo Tubes Ltd., Appellant, and holds 750 shares in his name. On 21.6.86, the Company made an offer of shares on right basis to the share holders and also to the public, at par. It was assured by the appellant that 16% dividend would be paid on each share. The year of the company was to close on 30.9.86. The Company however, did not pay the dividend @ 16% per annum for the year October, 1985 to September, 1986 as promised but paid at a lessor rate. Consequently, it is prayed that the dividend @ 16% per annum for 12 months ending 30.9.86 be got paid to the complainant from the Company. The respondent also made, Consumer Assistance Centre as a complainant alleging that his relatives and friends hold about 5000 shares each, in the Company. It is stated that they we















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top