Mr. Justice S.K.M. Lodha, President—Against the order dated 8.4.90 passed by the District Forum, Jaipur in Complaint Case No. 1206/90 the opposite parties have filed this appeal under Sec. 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“the Act” herein). By the impugned order, the District Forum directed the opposite parties-applicants that the amount of DC/SDC which was paid by the complainant-respondent to the Rajasthan Housing Board (“the Board”) may be set off against the dues that may be outstanding against the complainant.

2. The complainant-respondent was allotted House No. 40/11 in Mansarower Colony, Jaipur after payment of the entire amount. The possession of the house was delivered to the complainant on 10.7.89 and since then the complainant is owner in possession of the house. The complainant has alleged that by allotment-cum-possession letter No. 495 dated 22.5.89 a sum of Rs. 5668/- being extra charges for DC/SDC houses was recovered from him. It may be stated here that a revised allotment-cum-possession letter dated 53.90 was issued in which extra charges for DC/SDC houses mentioned were Rs. 5596/-. It is not in dispute before us that the complainant has deposited a sum