SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.K.M.LODHA, DAMODAR THANVI
MAHENDRA SINGH SINGHVI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice S.K.M. Lodha, President—This appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“the Act” herein) is directed against the order dated 13.8.1990 passed by the District Forum, Jaipur in Complaint Case No. 40/89. The District Forum dismissed the complaint. As we have come to the conclusion that this order has to be set aside and the case has to be remanded to the District Forum, Jaipur for a fresh decision, it is not necessary to give a detailed resume of the facts leading to this appeal. Suffice it to state that the complainant-appellant filed a complaint under Section 12of the Act against the opposite parties (Union of India, Maruti Udyog Ltd. and Alfa Automobiles, Jaipur) praying that the opposite parties may be directed (l) to deliver the vehicle to the complainant before 31.3.1989; (2) that the opposite parties may be directed to make payment of interest @ 18% p.a. on the amount deposited by the complainant from the date of deposit till the date of delivery of the vehicle; (3) that the opposite parties if fail to deliver the vehicle to the complainant before 31.3.1989 then the opposite parties may be directed to make payment of loss suffered by the com












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top