SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.N.MITTAL, S.BRAR
SANJAY MOHAN – Appellant
Versus
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Complainant :Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party :Mr. G.N. Rathi, Advocate.

ORDER

Miss S. Brar, Member—Briefly the facts of the case are that the complainant is a registered Public Limited Company and an insurance policy holder in respect of his car NE 118 91 model. The said car met with an accident on 11.8.91 and the complainant lodged a claim with respondent company. The insurance policy was valid upto 5.7.92. The Surveyor surveyed the car on 27.8.91. Complainant accepted the claim for Rs. 2 lakhs against his claim of Rs. 2.20 lakhs on 1.11.91 as car was declared total loss.

2. The Regional Office of the respondent company wrote to the Divisional Office on 6.2.92 sanctioning the settlement of the claim for Rs. 2 lakhs subject to depositing the original policy and the salvage in the respondent’s godown in the presence of the surveyor. Salvage was deposited in the insurance company’s godown on 25.2.92 against salvage collection memo, since the claim was not paid. Complainant gave a legal notice to the respondent on 3.3.92 for releasing the claim amount at the earliest.

3. Surveyor examined the salvage at the godown of the respondent on 26.2.92 and submitted his report on 27.2.92 indicating the value of the missing parts namely battery at Rs. 4,405/-. In the r
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top