SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K.R.RAMASWAMY IYENGAR, D.R.VITHAL RAO
BHAMY V. SHENOY – Appellant
Versus
MANAGING DIRECTOR, MYSORE MILK UNION LTD. – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice D.R. Vithal Rao, President— This appeal, by the complainant, is directed against the order dated 10-3 -1992, passed by the District Forum, Mysore, in complaint No. 691/90-91 dismissing the complaint.

The facts, briefly stated, are as follows :

1. The appellant-complainant, sought the following reliefs in the complaint:—

"We pray for the following : The company should strengthen the quality standards based on the recommendation of a reputed consulting firm, to levy a penalty on the company of atleast Rs. 1,000/- as a token so that they will be more careful and also to pay us for our expenses involved in filing this case."

2. 2.It is the case of the complainant that one Mr. Nagesh purchased a Milk satchet from the opposite party, in which ant and cockroach was found. This fact was published in the local newspaper. Re-action of the opposite party was one of indifference. So the complainant claimed reliefs as narrated above.

3. 3.The opposite party, though served, remained absent, did not file any statement of objections. The complainant did not lead any evidence either oral or documentary.

4. 4.The District Forum, considering the facts and the circumstances averred in the c







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top