SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.N.SAXENA, R.N.MITTAL, SATWANT BRAR
NARENDER KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
BHIM RAJ GUPTA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Complainant:Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate.
For the Opp. Party :Mr. S.P. Agarwal, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice R.N. Mittal, President— This appeal has been filed by Shri Narender Kumar on opposite party, against the order of the District Forum No. 1 dated 14th November, 1991 by which the opposite parties were directed to pay an amount of Rs. 7,500/- to the complainant alongwith interest @ 18% p.a. w.e.f. 21st Feb., 1988 till the date of payment alongwith Rs. 1,000/- as costs.

2. 2.Briefly the facts are that Sh. Bhim Raj Gupta Complainant deposited an amount of Rs. 10,000/- with M/s. Jagmohan Lai Pawan Kumar (hereinafter referred to as the firm) on interest @ 18% p.a. payable quarterly, on 22.8.87. It is alleged that an amount of Rs. 2,500/- was paid by the firm on 8th August, 1988 and a receipt dated 8th August, 1988 was issued by it to the Complainant.

3. 3.Shri Narender Kumar, Jagmohan Lal, and Pawan Kumar opposite parties are the partners of the firm. Thus, an amount of Rs. 7,500/- alongwith interest was payable by them. Consequently, the Complainant prayed that the opposite parties be directed to pay an amount of Rs. 7,500/- with interest @ 18% p.a. to him.

4. 4.The complaint was contested by the Complainant Sh. Narender Kumar, who inter-alia pleaded that the amount of Rs.












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top