SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES
REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AHMEDABAD
Honble Mr. Justice S.A. Shah, President; Ms. Leelaben Trivedi, Member
LAKSHMANBHAI NAGINDAS PARMAR—Appellant/Complainant
versus
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY—Respondent/Opposite Party
F.A. No. 10 of 1992—Decided on 17.6.1992

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : In person.
For the Respondent:Mr. S.C. Vakharia, Advocate.

The breach of policy conditions by the rikshaw driver did not absolve the Insurance Company from liability, and the Insurance Company was held liable for 75% of the damages.

Headnote:

Insurance - Rikshaw - Liability of Insurance Company for damages

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, owner of a rikshaw involved in an accident, filed a complaint for damages. The District Forum dismissed the complaint, citing breach of policy conditions by the rikshaw driver. The appellant reduced the claim and sought damages only for the vehicle.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the driver's breach of policy conditions did not absolve the Insurance Company from liability, citing a previous case where taking additional passengers was not considered a fundamental breach. The Court allowed the claim for 75% of the damages with interest.

Issues: Breach of policy conditions, Liability of Insurance Company

Ratio Decidendi: Taking additional passengers was not considered a fundamental breach, and the Insurance Company was held liable for 75% of the damages.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, the District Forum's decision was set aside, and the Insurance Company was ordered to pay Rs. 2,250 with interest and costs to the appellant.

ORDER

Mr. Justice S.A. Shah, President—The appellant is the original complainant who is owning a rikshaw which met with an accident resulting into damage to his vehicle. The District Forum has dismissed the complaint on the ground that the driver of the rikshaw has taken additional passengers which was in violation of the policy conditions and, therefore, the Insurance Company was not liable to make any payment of the damages. There appears to be no dispute regarding the damages caused. The appellant states that he has himself reduced the claim and has only prayed for the damages which have been accepted by the other side as damages to his vehicle.

2. 2. Mr. Vakharia the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondent submits that the complainant has committed breach of the policy conditions and, therefore, the Company is not liable for any damage and supports the judgement given by the District Forum.

3. There is no dispute that the rikshaw is owned by the appellant which was given to his driver. It also appears that the driver has taken additional passengers in breach of one of the conditions of the policy. However, we have held in Complaint No. 131/91 in the case of Jagdish Harilal Thakkar v. New India Assurance Company Limited that taking additional passengers is not a fundamental breach which will absolve the Insurance Company from all liabilities. According to the instructions issued by the Insurance Company such type of breach is considered to be non standard claim for which they have adopted a policy to make payment of 75%. We have given full reasoning to arrive at this decision. Therefore we do not repeat the same.

4. Mr. Vakharia could not point out any error committed by us in the said judgment. In the aforesaid view of the matter we allow the claim of the complainant to the extent of 75% with interest @ 18% p.a. Since the appellant has succeeded and has not engaged any Advocate we grant the cost of Rs. 150/- only.

ORDER

The appeal is allowed. The decision of the District Forum is set aside. The Insurance Company will pay Rs. 2,250/- to the appellant complainant with running interest @ 18% p.a. after two months from the date of accident till the payment is made and will also pay Rs. 150/- as cost throughout.

Appeal allowed with cost.

_



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top