SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.R.VITHAL RAO, SUSHEELA CHELUVARAJU
MAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEEDS CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SIDDANNA – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice D.R. Vithal Rao, President — This appeal, by the Opposite Party, is directed against the order dated 29.6.1993, passed by the District Forum, Bijapur, in complaint No. 57/92, directing the opposite party, as per orders of the President, a sum of Rs. 3,300 / and as per orders of the Members, a sum of Rs. 16,000/- to the complainant.

2. We have called for the records and received. We have also heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

3. From the material available on record, we find the material infirmity in the order recorded by the District Forum, Bijapur. So we are not going to discuss the merits of the case, as the complaint has to be remitted to the District Forum, Bijapur, for fresh disposal in accordance with law.

4. The records show that the President and both the Members recorded the proceedings and heard the parties. The President only passed an order directing the Opposite Party to pay a sum of Rs. 3,000/- to the complainant. This order, passed by the President, is not signed by the other Members. It is signed only by the President. The other two Members passed a separate order, directing the opposite party to pay a sum of Rs. 16,000/- to the complainant. T







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top