SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.K.M.LODHA, DAMODAR THANVI
SURENDRA KUMAR KUMAWAT – Appellant
Versus
(SMT. ) SUNIL JAIN – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice S.K.M. Lodha, President— Surendra Kumar Kumavat and Smt. Sushila Kumavat who are husband and wife filed a complaint under Section 12 read with Section 17(1)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“the Act” herein) against Dr. Smt. Sunil Jain (Opposite Party No. 1), Dr. R.K. Jain (Opposite Party No. 2) and Dr. Ramavatar (Opposite Party No. 3) for award of Rs. 1,50,000/- as compensation. A further prayer was made that a direction may be issued to the opposite parties not to act in a way by perpetrating fraud, falsehood etc.

x x x Text in Hindi omitted x x x with the other consumers as was done with the complainants. The complaint was filed before the State Commission on 10.9.90.

2. Opposite Parries Nos. 2 & 1 are husband and wife. When Complainant No. 2 became pregnant, she felt some trouble as after three daughters in future, the complainant wanted a son and not the daughter as the complainants believed in family planning. When complainant No. 2 was having pregnancy of one and quarter month, complainant No. 1 being husband of complainant No. 2 took his wife on 7.7.89 to the clinic of opposite parties Nos. 1 and 2. They approached opposite parties Nos. 1 and 2 and to



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top