SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES
REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HYDERABAD
Hon’ble Mr. Justice A. Venkatarami Reddy, President;
Smt. J. Ananda Lakshmi, Member
G. DHANA LAKSHMI—Appellant
versus
V. SRIDEVI—Respondent
C.D.A. No. 26 of 1992—Decided on 7.3.94

For the Appellant :Mr. P. Veera Reddy, Advocate
For the Respondent:M/s C. Srinivas Advocates

ORDER

Mr. Justice A. Venkatarami Reddy, President—The complaint is filed for payment of Rs. 30,000/- said to have been collected by the opposite party towards chit amount. Notices were served on the opposite party, but it was observed by the District Forum that she is avoiding to receive notice although the notices were sent personally and through the Head Master of the High School. In these circumstances, the District Forum held that the opposite party collected a sum of Rs. 30,000/- from time to time towards chits, and failed to repay the same inspite of repeated requests. It accordingly directed refund of Rs. 30,000/-. In the absence of any material adduced by the appellant, before this Commission to show that such amounts were not collected by her and that she is not liable to pay. We are not inclined to interfere with the order of the District Forum. The appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Appeal dismissed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top