Mr. Y. Krishan, Member—This is an appeal against the order dated 28th April, 1993 passed by the State Commission of Delhi in Case No. C- 20/91. By this order the State Commission has held that the Bank locker hired by the respondent- complainant had been tampered with after 5-4-1988 while it was in the custody of the appellant- opposite party, that the contents of the locker were stolen while these were in the custody of the Bank due to the negligence of the officials of the appellant-bank. It therefore, ordered the appellant-opposite party to pay Rs. 1,10,460 with interest at 18% from 5-4-1988 andx costs of Rs. 2,500.

2. Briefly the facts are that the respondent opposite party had hired alocker in the Faridabad branch of the appellant Bank. In this locker the respondent complainant is stated to have kept her gold ornaments and jewellery. She operated the locker on the 5th of April, 1988 before it was pilfered.

3. On 21st of September, 1988 the then custodian of the Bank as well as the Branch Manager, after inspection, found that the door of the locker was in a tilted position. Consequently, two Bank officials were sent to the residence of the respondent complainant to inform he