Mr. Justice A. Venkatarami Reddy, President—The opposite party i.e. Marketing Manager, ‘Samayam’, Telugu Daily, Hyderabad, is the appellant. With a very good intention of starting a Telugu Daily by name ‘Samayam’, the opposite party advertised in the papers calling for quotation for transporting the papers on certain routes in East Godavari District. The routes are, so far as we are concerned (1) Rajahmundry to Kesanakurru and (2) Ravulapalem to Kotipalli. The complainant believing that the said paper would be started very soon, agreed to transport the paper in the routes aforementioned. According to the terms of the agreement, he deposited for both routes a sum of Rs. 6,500/- by way of demand draft which was evidenced by a receipt dated 1.3.86, passed by the opposite parties acknowledging the receipt of the same on 3.3.86. It is the case of the complainant that after making the deposit, he waited nearly for a period of 6 years i.e. from 1986 till 1991, with a hope that the opposite party will start the paper. As the opposite party did not do so, he requested for refund of the money deposited by him, by a letter dated 12.6.91. Since there was no response from the opposite part