SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.K.M.LODHA, DAMODAR THANVI
RAJASTHAN STATE INSURANCE & G. P. F. DEPTT. – Appellant
Versus
RADHEY SHYAM GOYAL – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice S.K.M. Lodha, President— The question of limitation is involved in both the appeals. They were heard together. We consider it proper to dispose them of by a common order.

2. The complainant-respondent filed two complaints which were registered as Complaint Nos. 429/89 and 430/89 by the District Forum, Jaipur. Both the complaints were decided by the District Forum on 17.12.1990, and certain directions with regard to payment of interest were issued by the District Forum. Aggrieved the Opposite Party-appellant has lodged two separate appeals. Appeal No. 121/91 arises out of Complaint No. 429/89 and Appeal No. 125/91 arises out of Complaint No. 430/89. The appeals were filed on 21.2.1991 against the order dated 17.12.1990. Certified copies of the order appealed against have been submitted with the memo of appeal. The certified copies show that the application for copy were made on 21.12.1990. The date fixed for issuance of the copies was 2.1.1991. The copies were taken delivery of on 2.1.1991. Time spent in obtaining the certified copies is 13 days. Period prescribed for filing the appeal is 30 days from the date of order as provided in Sec. 15 of the Consumer Protectio



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top