SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.G.LONEY, M.G.GAVAI
RAJENDRA MANMOHAN BARTAKKE – Appellant
Versus
H. G. ABHYANKAR – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice G.G. Loney, President—This is an application filed by original opposite party to quash and set aside the order of this Commission dated 5.11.92 passed in Complaint No. 252/91. The applicant contended that written statement/reply in answer to the allegations of complainant Dr. H.G. Abhyankar presently, non-applicant, was sent to this Commission on 10.3.1992 by registered post with acknowledgment due and it was received in the Office of the State Commission on 6.3.1992. The applicant further contended that despite the said reply of applicant, this Commission proceeded ex-parte against him. The complainant further contended that there was no deficiency in his service as he has completed the construction as per the second agreement dated 22.6.91. It is further submitted that complainant Dr. H.G. Abhyankar had filed a Civil Suit No. 1413/91 in the Court of Civil Judge, Snr. Division, Pune on 15.11.91 against the applicant interalia praying for specific performance of the aforesaid agreement. It is further contended that Dr. Abhyankar prayed for a decree for specific performance of agreement or in the alternative claimed the reliefs of Rs. 2,00,000/- towards the cost of










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top