Mr. Justice B.S. Yadav, Member—This judgment will dispose of First Appeals Nos. 520 and 575 both of 1992 as both cases arise out of the order dated May 8, 1993 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan at Jaipur.

2. The facts giving rise to these appeals are: that the present Respondent No. 1 in Appeal No. 520 of 1992 Shri Aklesh Kumar Bansal is the husband of Smt. Sunita Bansal, since deceased and Respondents Nos. 2 & 3 who are the minor sons of Respondent No. 1 and Sunita, deceased had filed a complaint against M/s. Flame Gas Service and one Shri Poonam Chand Rawat, who were Opposite Parties Nos. 1 & 2 in the complaint and now Appellants in First Appeal No. 520 of 1992. M/s. Indian Oil Corporation, who was arrayed as Opposite Party No. 3 in the said complaint is the Appellant in the other Appeal No. 575 of 1992. In Appeal No. 575 of 1992, M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. has made all the other parties as Respondents. The parties wi11 be referred to in these appeals as they were arrayed in the complaint. In the complaint, the complainant had alleged that they are Indane gas consumers having gas connection No. F-407. Opposite Party No. 1 had supplied