SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.N.SINHA, K.P.SINHA, KALPANA ASHOK
S. D. O. TELEPHONES – Appellant
Versus
SHIV SHANKAR PRASAD – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None.

ORDER

Mr. Justice B.N. Sinha, President—This appeal is directed against order dated 16th June, 1992 passed by the District Forurn, Hazaribagh in Complaint Case No. 3 of 92 in which the appellant here was the Opposite Party and the respondent here was the complainant before the District Forum.

2. Necessary facts of the case for the disposal of this appeal may be mentioned in brief as follows:—

The complainant has telephone bearing No. 2170 which was disconnected on the ground of non-payment of the bill dated 11.9.91 though the same had been paid by the complainant and that in January, 1992 a bill for Rs. 1244/- was sent to the complainant though there was no STD facility in the telephone of the complainant and the local calls cannot be to the extent of Rs. 1244.00. Hence the bill was excessive and inflated. The complainant on these grounds prayed for quashing the bill and also for compensation of Rs. 10,000.00 as damages for illegal disconnection.

3. On being noticed the Opposite Party appeared and filed counter version admitting that the telephone of the complainant was by mistake disconnected on the ground of nonpayment of the bill dated 11.9.91 which had already been paid by the comp







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top