SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R.C.MANKAD, LEELABEN TRIVEDI
KRISHNA OIL CAKE INDUSTRIES – Appellant
Versus
RAJGURU TRANSPORT – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Complainant :Mr. K.J. Vora, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice R.C. Mankad, President— Complainant No.1, a partnership firm carrying on business at Upleta, consigned 9805 kgs. of loose rapeseed oil worth Rs. 3,30,000/- from Upleta to Bombay through the opponent. Complainant No.l was both consignor and consignee. The opponent charged freight of Rs. 5,200/- for transporting the oil from Upleta to Bombay. The oil was loaded in Tanker bearing Registration No. GRP 6416. The oil was insured with complainant No.2 insurance company for Rs. 3,30,000/- under Transit/ Marine Policy No. 300400/400/4400135 dated August 9, 1991.

2. The opponent failed to deliver the entire consignment of 9805 kgs. of oil. At the time of delivery, there was shortage of 4320 kgs. of oil. On enquiry, the opponent informed complainant No.1 under certificate dated November 11,1991 to the effect that the tanker in which oil was transported met with accident near Kosamba Railway Station, 30 kms. from Ankleshwar and as a result of the accident, 4320 kgs. of oil leaked out of the tanker without any chance of recovery. By the said certificate, opponent admitted non-delivery of 4320 kgs. of oil. It further appears that complainant No.2 insurance company had appointed s








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top