SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.A.KADER, RAMANI MATHURANAYAGAM
S. C. SEGARAM – Appellant
Versus
ANZ GRINDLAYS BANK – Respondent


ORDER

Tr. Justice S.A. Kader, President—This is a complaint under Section 17 read with Sec. 12 of the Consumer Protection Ac

2. The Complainant purchased M/s Thomas Cook Travellers Cheques to the value of 24,550 US $ from the first Opposite Party ANZ Grindlays Bank. The complainant spent 50 travellers cheque worth about 1550 US $ and lost the balance traveller cheques to the value of 23,000 US $ on 4.11.91 when he was travelling in an auto-rickshaw. On 5.11.91 the first Opposite Party ANZ Grindlays Bank was duly informed and the complaint was given to the police. He approached M/s. Thomas Cook (India) Ltd., Madras Office for refund but in vain. He therefore filed O.P. 191/93 on the file of this Commission against M/s. Thomas Cook (India) Ltd., Madras for refund of the amount alleging deficiency in service. M/s. Thomas Cook (India) Ltd., Madras contended that these travellers cheques were not issued by it but by M/s. Thomas Cook (INC) New York and it was not in any way responsible for refund of the amount. This contention was accepted by this Commission and O.P. 191/93 was dismissed by its order dated 31.12.93. The complainant has now filed a fresh complaint against (1) ANZ Grindlays





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top