SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

D.R.VITHAL RAO, SUSHEELA CHELUVARAJU
PARIMAL COMPUTERS & DATA PROCESSING CENTRE (P) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
PROJECT CO-ORDINATOR – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice D.R. Vithal Rao, President— In this complaint the complainant has sought a direction to the opposite party to settle his claim and to pay the balance amount in a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- and a further sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- as compensation.

2. The complainant is Parimal Computers and Data Processing Centre (P) Ltd. Itis the case of the complainant that the opposite party — The Project Co-ordinator had entrusted the work of preparing the Computerised Project Report which the complainant prepared and executed. The complainant received a sum of Rs. 17311/- from the opposite party towards the supply of materials.

3. The opposite party during the second week of March, 1992 sent a letter to the complainant requesting the complainant to submit the quotation for preparation and development of the second project in connection with the above reducing the total cost of the project. The complainant also prepared the second project report and submitted the same to the opposite party. The complainant received a sum of Rs. 20,000/- for this project and later on claimed a sum of Rs. 1,31,826/- from the opposite party for the said report.

4. It is the further case of the complainant that















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top