SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.BALAKRISHNAN, P.K.SHAMSUDDIN
ANDHARAYOSE – Appellant
Versus
MOIDEEN RAWTHER – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mr. Justice P.K. Shamsuddin, President— The 2nd opposite party in O.P.1381/92 on the file of the District Forum, Kottayam is the appellant.

2. The complainant authorised the 1st opposite party to buy a good quality of cow of high yielding. The 1st opposite party informed the complainant that a cow owned by the 2nd opposite party was available for sale and the cow will give 5 bottles of milk every day. The complainant entrusted Rs. 3500/- the price of the cow to the 1st opposite party and on 29.10.1992 the 1st opposite party paid Rs. 3500/- to the wife of the 2nd opposite party. The 3rd and 4th opposite parties accompanied the 1st opposite party and brought the cow to the complainant. Two lesions in the udder of the cow were notified and when asked the complainant was told that it was due to the calf's biting. When the cow was milked on the second day it gave only 2½ bottles of milk. When it was reported to the opposite parties, the 1st and 3rd opposite parties came to his house and milked the cow and got only 2½ and 3y2 bottles of milk. On 30.10.1992 the lesions in the udder increased and on 2.11.1992 the entire udder, face and legs were of lesions and when shown to a veter




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top