SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R.N.MITTAL, S.BRAR
ULTRACHEM INDUSTRIES – Appellant
Versus
GEETA ROADWAYS – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Complainant :Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate.
For the Opp. Party :Miss Seema Gupta, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice R.N. Mittal, President—Briefly, the facts are that the complainant is manufacturing Ultarmhrine Blue (Neel). He booked four consignments of Neel from Delhi to Karnal as detailed below:—

S.No. G.R. No. Date of booking Nos of bags Value of goods

1. 10395 9.1.1992 60 Rs. 35,943/-

2. 10394 9.1.1992 10 Rs. 5,990/-

3. 13362 14.4.1992 40 Rs. 23,520/-

4. 14703 29.5.1992 80 Rs. 47,040/-

Total : Rs. 1,12,493/-


Out of the said consignments 1st 3 were in the name of self and the 4th in the name of Binaca Washing Powder Company. It is alleged that the O.P. delivered the goods without getting the good's receipt to someone. Consequently, there is deficiency in service on their part and they are liable to pay the price of goods to the complaintant.

2. The complaint has been contested by the opposite party (O.P.). They inter alia pleaded that the payment of the goods had been made to the complainant and, therefore, they are not entitled to get any amount from them.

3. The only question that arises for determination is, whether, there was any deficiency in service on the part of the O.P. It is not disputed that the goods were delivered by the O.P. to some persons without getting the go






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top