Mr. Justice G.G. Loney, President—Heard Shri T.N. Tripathi, Advocate for the complainant and Ms. D’lima, Advocate for the opposite party. The order passed by this Commission dated 19.5.93 in Complaint No. 171 /93 has not been complied with by opposite party i.e. Syndicate Bank so far. By an order dated 6.12.1993 we have held Syndicate Bank guilty under Sec. 27 of the Consumer Protection Act and the time was granted to the opposite party for hearing on the point of sentence on 8.12.1993 on 8.12.1993 it was represented by the opposite party that they are facing action from their client to deposit the amount in Court by 10.12.1993. In view of the said statement, the miscellaneous application was posted today for final order. Even today the Syndicate Bank has failed to comply with the order passed by this Commission. It is stated by the learned Advocate for the opposite party that the General Manager of Syndicate Bank is out of station and therefore no decision can be taken as regards the payment to be given to the complainant. This is totally in disregard to the undertaking given, .by the Advocate for the opposite party on 8.12.1993. We therefore heard the parties on the point of