Mr. Justice G.M. Mir, President—This appeal has been filed against the order of the Divisional Forum Jammu dated 9.2.1992 whereunder the Divisional Forum has dismissed the complaint. The facts of the case reveal that the appellant herein allegedly purchased a juicer from the respondent on 24.10.1992. The receipt and the guarantee card were issued to him but the Juicer bursted soon after its purchase and therefore he demanded return of price of the Juicer as well as compensation for having been put to inconvenience. The learned Divisional Forum while rejecting the complaint appears to have been lead to this conclusion by obviously wrong mentioning of dates in the complaint and has dismissed the complaint on that ground alone. In. the order under appeal it has been observed, that the complainant had himself stated that he purchased Juicer on 27.10.1992. It is held that which the Juicer was sold on 27.10.1992 how it was possible for any one to say and believe that the same bursted three days before that date.

2. We have gone through the appeal and in our view the learned Divisional Forum has in a hasty manner disposed of the complaint. No statement whatsoever has been recorded eit