SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES
REDRESSAL COMMISSION BOMBAY
Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.G. Loney,
President and Smt. Ellen Dharkar, Member
R.B. PADHYA—Complainant
versus
KABIR AUTOMOBILES & ANR.—Opp. Parties
Misc. Appeal No. 94 of 1993—Decided on 25.10.1994

Headnote:Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 25 and 27 - Non-compliance of order of Commission whereby opposite party No. 2 M/s. Sipani Automobiles was to pay Rs. 1,25,025 with 18% interest - Complainant directed to approach District Court, Bangalore for execution of order - For penal action, opposite parties held guilty u/s. 27 of the Act· Fine of Rs.10,000/- imposed on M/s. Sipani Automobiles and fine of Rs. 1000/- imposed on Mi/ Kabir Auto-mobiles - Collector Nagpur & Bangalore to recover fine as arrears of land revenue u/s. 421(1)(b) Cr. P.C.

       Result: Application disposed of.

       

ORDER

Mr. Justice G.G. Loney, President—This proceedings are commenced on application from complainant under Secs. 25 & 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1936 alleging the non-compliance of the order of this Commission dated 13.8.92 passed on Complaint No. 111/92. By the aforesaid order, this Commission has directed Opposite Party No. 2 M/s. Sipani Automobiles to pay to complainant Rs. 1,25,025/- together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from 7.12.1990. The Opposite Party No. 1 M/s. Kabir Automobiles was directed to pay Rs. 1000/- as costs. The Opposite Parties were noticed as regards the execution of the order of this Commission mentioned above under Sec. 25 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. We directed the complainant to approach the District Court, Bangalore for execution of the aforesaid order under Sec. 25 of the Consumer Protection Act. 1986.

2. So far as penal action under Sec. 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is concerned, the Opposite Parties remained absent on the dates of hearing. We therefore find that the Opposite Parties have failed to comply the order of this Commission. Despite this proceedings and having served with the intimation of the aforesaid order of this Commission the Opposite Parties omitted to comply with the aforesaid order. In the circumstances, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sec. 27 of the Consumer Protection Act. 1986 . We hold both the Opposite Parties guilty under Sec. 27. of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and impose on opposite party No. 2 viz. M/s. Sipani Automobiles Ltd. a fine of Rs. 10,000/- over and above the amount of cost already directed to be paid as per final order passed by this Commission. The Opposite Party No. 1 viz. M/s. Kabir Automobiles is also sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- for committing the breach within the meaning of Sec. 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Registrar will issue a copy of this order to Collector, Nagpur & Bangalore requesting them to recover the aforesaid fine from the Opposite Parties as arrears of land revenue under Sec. 421(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Ordered accordingly.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top