SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.G.SETHU LAKSHMI, K.BALAKRISHNAN, P.K.SHAMSUDDIN
P. V. ABRAHAM – Appellant
Versus
COPYTRON SERVICE – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice P.K. Shamsuddin, President— The complainant is a retired Government Officer who is running Geetha Photostats and Institute in the Rajadhani Buildings, East Fort, Thiruvananthapuram-23. The case of the complainant was that the proprietor of the 1st opposite party approached him and agreed to supply the Richo FT 4085 photo copier within ten days after confirmation of orders. The proforma invoice stated that the payment of cost should be made to Rajgraphics and Business Machines, Madras. On 1.11.89 Sri. R.C. Vikas, one of the proprietors of Copitron Services intimated the complainant that RICHO 4085 copier was sold and that a copier of the Cannon Company of Japan with better facilities than RICHO FT 4065 was available with them for immediate sale. As the complainant had read and heard much about the precision in performance of Cannon Photocopiers, he believing Sri. R.C Vikas, asked him to supply that machine which was readily available with them. It was insisted by the complainant that the machine should be new, that proper bills and connected papers relating to its import should be made available along with the Catalogue, warranty etc., that the machine should be ins




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top