SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.S.VERMA, S.P.GOYAL, VIDYA SONKER
GITA AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice K.S. Verma, President—This Appeal is arised out of the complaint lodged by Smt. Gita Agarwal. The complaint has been dismissed and the complainant has come up in Appeal before the State Commission.

2. In the complaint of the complainant has set-up claim for damages amounting to a sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand), on account of poor quality of masonary work, sanitary work and electricity work and has also claimed treatment charges on account of injury caused to the elbow on account of defective masonary work of the floor. The complainant was allotted a house No. R-72, Rajkunj vide letter dated 5.12.88. The entire amount payable was paid on 31.10.1990 but the possession was delivered on 20.11.1991. It is alleged by the complainant while taking the possession the complainant was not satisfied with the quality of masonary work. The complainant narrated the poor quality in material, sanitary fittings and electrical fittings. Due to non-availability of the water the complainant injured her elbow while bringing water from outside pump and spent Rs. 2000/-. On these allegations the complainant claimed certain instalments reliefs including damages.

3. The complaint was cont




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top