SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R.N.MITTAL, S.BRAR
CHAIRMAN, RAILWAY BOARD – Appellant
Versus
S. BHARATH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. D.P. Bhatia, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None.

ORDER

Mr. Justice R.N. Mittal, President—This appeal has been filed by the OP against the order of the District Forum (D.F.) dated 11-1-93.

2. Briefly, the facts are that the complainants travelled from Madras to Delhi on 23.12.91 by Tamilnadu Express, which leaves Madras at 21.00 hours. It left Madras at 22.20 hours. It is alleged that on 24.12.91 it was detained somewhere in the forest area for about seven hours i.e. from 15.00 hours to 22.00 hours without any reasonable cause.

3. It is further pleaded that on 24.12.91 no evening tea and dinner was served to the passengers causing unbearable agony to them. A complaint was lodged at Amla Station by them but inspite of that no proper arrangements for food were made for that night and for the next day. The train reached Delhi on 25.12.91 at 16.50 hours instead of the scheduled time of 06.45 hours.

4. It is next pleaded that the train was a superfast train for which they had paid higher charges and in few of the late arrival of the train by more than nine hours they were entitled to get the refund of the extra charges paid for that train. They also claimed damages for harassment and inconvenience.

5. The complaint was contested by the OP.













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top