SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K.BALAKRISHNAN, C.G.SETHU LAKSHMI, P.K.SHAMSUDDIN
DHANALEKSHMI BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
M. R. B. NAIR – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :M/s. Joseph & Paulose, Advocates.
For the Respondent: None.

ORDER

Mr. Justice P.K. Shamsuddin, President — This appeal is directed against the order passed by the District Forum, Kottayam in O.P. No. 861/92.

2. The only point raised by the Counsel for the appellant is that the District Forum committed a mistake in not awarding interest for the period subsequent to 6.4.92. As a matter of fact subsequently the District Forum corrected this mistake in a review petition but on appeal we held that the District Forum has no power to review and set aside the order. Since the appellant has filed an appeal against the order it would be appropriate to correct the omission by ordering that the complainant would be liable to pay interest at the rate of 17.5% on the balance amount for the period subsequent to 6.4.92 upto the date of payment. Subject to the above modification the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top