K.RANGA RAO, J.ANANDA LAKSHMI, A.VENKATARAMI REDDY
MAFATLAL CONSULTANCY SERVICES (INDIA) – Appellant
Versus
S. SURYANARAYANA – Respondent
Mr. Justice A. Venkatarami Reddy, President—This revision is filed by the Opposite Party in CD. No. 48 of 1994, aggrieved by the order of the District Forum passed in E.P. No. 77 of 1994 whereby the Opposite Party was sentenced to simple imprisonment for one month.
2. The case of the complainant is that she sent a sum of Rs. 6,000/- by way of Demand Draft to M/s. Mafatlal Consultancy Services India Limited for allotment of 600 units of L.I.C. mutual fund. But no shares were allotted inspite of letter written by him dated 25.6.1994 as no shares were sent. He filed this complaint for a direction to the Opposite Party to allot the shares and also to pay a sum of Rs. 500/- towards compensation. Before the District Forum the Opposite Party remained ex-parte.
4. The District Forum ordered the complainant. As the Opposite Party did not comply with the order of the District Forum, the Complainant filed a E.P. No. 77 of 1994. The District Forum by its order dated 26th day of October, 1994 sentenced the Opposite Party to suffer simple imprisonment for one month.
5. Aggrieved by the said order, this revision is preferred. It is submitted by the Counsel for the petitioner that they have sen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.