SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

N.P.SINGH, B.N.KIRPAL, J.S.VERMA
ASHISH HANDA, ADVOCATE – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF JUSTICE OF HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA – Respondent


qORDER

J.S. Verma, J. —The petitioner in an Advocate and a member of the Bar Association of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana. He filed a writ petition in the High Court of Punjab & Haryana challenging the appointment of Shri M.R. Agnihotri, a former Judge of the Punjab & Haryana High Court as the President of the Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission on completion of the term of Shri S.S. Sandhewalia, a former Chief Justice of the High Court, with effect from June 30,1994. The challenge was made on the ground that the appointment of Shri M.R. Angihotri was not in accordance with Section 16 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and in consonance with the principles applicable for making such an appointment. That writ petition (C.W.P. No. 7067 of 1994) was transferred to this Court for decision, in view of the importance of the question involved.

2. The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 prescribes in Section 16 for the composition of the State Commission as under :

“Composition of the State Commission— (1) Each State Commission shall consist of —

(a) a person who is or has been a Judge of a High Court, appointed by the State Government, who shall be its President :

[Provided














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top