SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.N.SINHA, K.P.SINHA, KALPANA ASHOK
ABDUL HAMEED – Appellant
Versus
M. D. , BIHAR STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice B.N. Sinha, President—This Case and Case No. 79 of 92 have been filed by one and the same person and they arise out of the same cause. Therefore with the consent of the parties they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The complainant has filed these two cases alleging deficiency in service on the part of the Bihar State Financial Corporation (hereinafter called the B.S.F.C.)-the Opposite Party in Case No. 78 of 92 and the State Bank of India (hereinafter called SBI) and its Regional Manager at Muzaffarpurthe Opposite Party in Case No. 79/92 for not proving adequate and timely working capital and subsequently in not providing rehabilitation finance when the complainant’s unit became uneconomic and sick for lack of adequate and timely working capital.

2. The complainant happens to be the proprietor of Green Foundary, Industrial Estate, Siwan a registered S.S.I. Unit which was planned and constructed by the complainant during 1979/ 81. The case of the complainant may be briefly stated. The B.S.F.C.-Opposite Party in Case No. 78 of 92 sanctioned a term loan to the complainant on 25.4.79 for Rs. 3.22 lacs. But the BSFC took more than













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top