SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.P.CHOWDHRI, S.BRAR
RAJINDER AGGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL DYRES & DRY CLEANERS – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. J.P. Dhanda, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Bhupinder Mehta, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice A.P. Chowdhri, President— Brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that appellant had given some clothes including a Saree for dry-cleaning to the Opposite Party (O.P.). When he went to collect the same he found that the Saree had not been properly drycleaned and on the contrary it had been badly damaged. When he complained he was insulted. He sent a legal notice claiming Rs. 5,000/- as damages. This was followed by a complainant in the District Forum.

2. The plea of the O.P. was that only one Saree as distinguished from several clothes was given but that too not for dry-cleaning but only for special pressing called ‘Charak’. It was stated. that the complaint be dismissed for suppression of material facts. It was further stated that the complainant was not satisfied with the ‘Charak’ carried out by the Opposite Party. The Opposite Party, therefore, offered not to charge Rs. 4/- which had been agreed as ‘Charak’ charges. After hearing both the parties, the District Forum dismissed the complaint and imposed costs of Rs. 200/- on the complainant.

3. Aggrieved by the order, the complainant has preferred this appeal. The appellant contended that he was not only insulted




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top