SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.R.VITHAL RAO, SUSHEELA CHELUVARAJU
A. SIDDARAMAPPA – Appellant
Versus
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice D.R. Vithal Rao, President— In this complaint under Section 17 read with Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the complainant has sought compensation in a sum of Rs. 8,19,245/- from the opposite parties i.e. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., National Insurance Co. Ltd. and New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

2. It is the case of the complainant that he had obtained insurance coverage from the opposite parties for the cotton seeds stored and stocked in its godowns. During the currency of the insurance coverage, on 29.4.88 when the buyers inspected the stock in one of the godowns it was found that 2,600 Qtls. of cotton seeds worth Rs. 10,01,000/- was damaged and the buyers refused to purchase the same.

3. The complainant immediately thereafter made claim with the opposite parties; opposite party Nos. 1, 2, and 3 had shouldered and shared the risk at 80%, 10% and 10% respectively. While the opposite parties were enquiring into the matter on the claim of the complainant, the complainant with the permission of the opposite parties sold the said damaged cotton seeds and realised by such a sale a sum of Rs. 3,78,000/-, in consequence of which the complainant suffered a loss


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top