D.R.VITHAL RAO, SUSHEELA CHELUVARAJU, KUMAR GOWDA
JIJA S. HARI SINGH, IPS. – Appellant
Versus
BIJOY ANAND RAGHAVAN – Respondent
Mr. Justice D.R. Vithal Rao, President— In this complaint, under Section 17 r/w Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the complainant has sought compensation in a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs from the opposite party-couriers.
2. The complainant-a Woman IPS officer, who was invited to attend the Annual Conference of International Association for Mass Communication Research (IAMCR) at Gaurajaa Saopaolo in Brazil and to present a paper — a study of Marital Disharmony — the Role of Police and Media Response, sent the papers proposed to be presented by the opposite party — couriers on 13.7.92, so as to reach the destination, that is, Stockholm, Sweden. The opposite party promised that the said document would reach Stockholm within a period, of 4 days therefrom, that is, on or before 17.7.1992.
3. The said document did not reach the destination as promised by the opposite party.
4. The complainant paid a sum of Rs. 600/-, as per Ex.C-6, to the opposite party for the said service.
5. The complainant received an International Fax message from Prof. Medelien Klegerg, as per Ex. C-11, dated 29.7.1992 stating that the papers were not received by them till then and requested to immediately c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.