SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

D.R.VITHAL RAO, SUSHEELA CHELUVARAJU, KUMAR GOWDA
JIJA S. HARI SINGH, IPS. – Appellant
Versus
BIJOY ANAND RAGHAVAN – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice D.R. Vithal Rao, President— In this complaint, under Section 17 r/w Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the complainant has sought compensation in a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs from the opposite party-couriers.

2. The complainant-a Woman IPS officer, who was invited to attend the Annual Conference of International Association for Mass Communication Research (IAMCR) at Gaurajaa Saopaolo in Brazil and to present a paper — a study of Marital Disharmony — the Role of Police and Media Response, sent the papers proposed to be presented by the opposite party — couriers on 13.7.92, so as to reach the destination, that is, Stockholm, Sweden. The opposite party promised that the said document would reach Stockholm within a period, of 4 days therefrom, that is, on or before 17.7.1992.

3. The said document did not reach the destination as promised by the opposite party.

4. The complainant paid a sum of Rs. 600/-, as per Ex.C-6, to the opposite party for the said service.

5. The complainant received an International Fax message from Prof. Medelien Klegerg, as per Ex. C-11, dated 29.7.1992 stating that the papers were not received by them till then and requested to immediately c

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top