KUMAR GOWDA, SUSHEELA CHELUVARAJU, D.R.VITHAL RAO
DIAMOND JEWELLARY MART – Appellant
Versus
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. – Respondent
Mr. Justice D.R. Vithal Rao, President— In this complaint under Section 17 read with Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the complainant has sought compensation in a sum of Rs. 1,60,300/- from the opposite partiesUnited India Insurance Company.
2. The complainant is having a shop known as M/s. Diamond Jewellary Mart’, Broadway at Hubli. He is a jeweller. The complainant obtained an Insurance Policy on 29.2.89, the period of which was from 29.2.89 to 28.2.90. It was a Burglary and House Breaking policy in respect of his shop. The Insurance amount was Rs. 14,55,000/-.
3. It is the case of the complainant that during the night of 15/16th March, 1989 a theft of burglary took place in the said shop. The complainant came to know of this fact in the morning of 16.3.89 and made a report of the occurrence to the police. The police recorded the Mahazar. At the same time the complainant also filed a claim petition with the opposite party. The opposite party repudiated the claim on some untenable grounds. So the complainant filed the complaint seeking sum of Rs. 85,300/- towards the value of the lost articles; Rs. 65,000/- towards the interest and Rs. 10,000/- as compensation t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.