SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R.C.MANKAD, JATIN P.VAIDYA
URJA – Appellant
Versus
JAYSHRIBEN YOGESHKUMAR DESAI – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the parties :
For the Appelants :Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None.

ORDER

Mr. Jusice R.C. Mankad, President—This appeal by Videocon International Limited (Company for short) is directed against the judgment and order dated February 16,1994 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Valsad (District Forum for short) in Complaint No. 122 of 1993 by which the Company is directed to replace the T.V. set and to pay compensation of Rs. 2,000/- for inconvenience and hardship and additional compensation of Rs. 500/- to respondent No. 1 (respondent for short)

2. Facts leading to this appeal briefly stated are as follows :

Respondent No. 1 is original complainant who had purchased T.V. set known as “Picture-in-Picture” for Rs. 21,190/- on May 26,1992. It is alleged that sometime after the T.V. set was purchased, it was not working properly and there was overlaping of sound or mixing of two sounds or voices of two pictures. That respondent, therefore, complained to the Company and the Company sent its technician to repair the T.V. set. According to the respondent although the T.V. set was repaired more than once by the Company’s technician, it could not be put in order on account of manufacturing defect. The respondent had to undergo hardship and








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top