D.R.VITHAL RAO, KUMAR GOWDA
V. B. PATIL – Appellant
Versus
MANAGER, CANARA BANK – Respondent
Mr. Kumar Gowda, Member—This is a complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The claim of the complainant is that he had obtained a loan availing over- draft facility upto a sum of Rs. 15,000/- with opposite party No. 1-Canara Bank under loan account No. VSL. 136/91. As a security for the due payment of the loan, the complainant had pledged four L.I.C. policies with the 1st opposite party-Bank. The policies given in security were as follows:
S. No. Policy No. Sum assured.
1. 61175288 Rs. 10,000/-
2. 64292132 Rs. 10,000/-
3. 73986701 Rs. 25,000/
4. 73986702 Rs. 25,000/-
Total S.A. Rs. 70,000/-
The sum assured under the above policies was a total sum of Rs. 70,000/- and on maturity the complainant would have received more than Rs. 1,50,000/ - by way of bonus and other benefits declared by the 2nd opposite party-The Life Insurance Corporation of India. On 26.2.92, the 1st opposite party wrote a letter to the complainant that he was due in a sum of Rs. 12,159/- out of which Rs. 6,394/- was over due. The 1st opposite party-Bank in a high-handed manner and without affording an opportunity to the complainant has surrendered all the four L.I.C. policies, which was unnec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.