SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.R.VITHAL RAO, KUMAR GOWDA
V. B. PATIL – Appellant
Versus
MANAGER, CANARA BANK – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Kumar Gowda, Member—This is a complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The claim of the complainant is that he had obtained a loan availing over- draft facility upto a sum of Rs. 15,000/- with opposite party No. 1-Canara Bank under loan account No. VSL. 136/91. As a security for the due payment of the loan, the complainant had pledged four L.I.C. policies with the 1st opposite party-Bank. The policies given in security were as follows:

S. No. Policy No. Sum assured.

1. 61175288 Rs. 10,000/-

2. 64292132 Rs. 10,000/-

3. 73986701 Rs. 25,000/

4. 73986702 Rs. 25,000/-

Total S.A. Rs. 70,000/-

The sum assured under the above policies was a total sum of Rs. 70,000/- and on maturity the complainant would have received more than Rs. 1,50,000/ - by way of bonus and other benefits declared by the 2nd opposite party-The Life Insurance Corporation of India. On 26.2.92, the 1st opposite party wrote a letter to the complainant that he was due in a sum of Rs. 12,159/- out of which Rs. 6,394/- was over due. The 1st opposite party-Bank in a high-handed manner and without affording an opportunity to the complainant has surrendered all the four L.I.C. policies, which was unnec


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top