Mr. Justice M.R. Agnihotri, President—In this appeal filed by M/s. Bajrang Bali Brick Kiln Company, Ladwa, order of the learned District Forum, Hisar dated 17th of October, 1994, has been challenged mainly on the ground that the complaint filed by the respondent-Satyaveer Arya, Advocate, Hisar has been allowed without first ensuring the service of the complaint on opposite party No. 2 Mr. Suresh Kumar and without affording to the appellants-opposite party an adequate opportunity of producing their documentary evidence on record, as also without deciding the questions regarding the maintainability of the complaint as the dispute between the parties being a complicated one deserved to be decided only by a Civil Court.

2. Briefly stated, respondent-Satyaveer Arya, an Advocate of Hisar approached Mr. Makhan Lai and Mr. Suresh Kumar-opposite parties No. 1 & 2 for the supply of bricks required for the construction of certain buildings. For that purpose, he made advance payment on 16th of December, 1991 and entered into an agreement with the opposite parties. According to the complainant, opposite parties No. 1 & 2 Makhan Lai and Suresh Kumar, were the partners of M/s. Bajrang Bali Br