Mr. Justice D. Annoussamy, President— These are appeals by all the three parties in the case.

2. A complaint was filed by the Appellant in A. No. 20/95 stating the following facts which are gatherable from the complaint and from the letter dated 30.10.93 that the complainant has written to the District Telecom Manager (Second opposite party) and which is appended to the complaint. The complainant wanted to contact his sister urgently at Madurai. He went to the public booth for STD belonging to the first opposite party. He gave the number to be called to the person incharge. The Number was 46457. As per the complainant a wrong number was called which he quotes as 44768 or so. Therefore, the call was discontinued and his number was called afresh. Thereafter he received two bills the details of which are produced below :—

1st Bill SI. No 0083

Date 30.10.93

Time 15.42.22

Dial No. 045246457

Tariff 04

Secs. 0027

Charge Rs. 0010.00

Sc 00

Total Rs. 0010.00

2nd Bill Sl. No. 0084

Date 30.10.93

Time 15.46.26

Dial No. 045246457

Tariff 04

Sees. 0060

Charge Rs. 0020.00

Sc. 00

Total Rs. 0020.00

The contention of the complainant is that for the first call he owes only Rs. 8.25 and not Rs. 10/- as