SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DESH BANDHU AGGARWAL, A.P.CHOWDHRI
I. J. SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
P. S. JAIN – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Complainant :Mr. Kamlesh Kumar, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party :Mr. P.K. Seth, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice A.P. Chowdhri, President — Brief facts alleged in the complaint are that on the basis of an advertisement in a leading English news paper the complainant contacted Medical Council of India, New Delhi for admission of his daughter Manisha Sharma to the under-graduate course in Medical Institute in USSR. The opposite party, who is running an office under the name and style of M/s. Indo Soviet Medical Education Care & Research Foundation, contacted the complainant and offered his services to arrange visa and payment for studies in USSR on payment of Rs. 2.50 lacs. The complainant arranged a sum of Rs. 2.40 lacs with great difficulty and paid the same to the opposite party in four instalments. Complainant’s daughter was sent to USSR by the complainant in October, 91. According to the understanding referred to above the opposite party was required to pay for the entire medical course but he failed to pay the dues. Complainant’s daughter, accordingly, wrote to her father about the same. The complainant contacted the opposite party, who sent him away by giving further assurances. The complainant’s daughter, however, came back in July, 1992. The complainant met the respond






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top